What Is a Stock Option Report (SO Report)?
When a foreign parent company grants or allows the exercise of stock options (SO), restricted stock units (RSUs), or other equity-based compensation to directors or employees residing in Japan, a specific Japanese tax filing obligation may arise. This obligation concerns the filing of the “Statement of Economic Benefits Provided by a Foreign Parent Company, etc. to Directors or Employees Residing in Japan.” This document, commonly referred to as the SO Report, is not a mere administrative formality, it functions as a key entry-point document for tax audits, through which the tax authorities closely examine issues such as the following.
Under Japanese income tax law, corporate tax law, and international taxation practice, key Points Scrutinized by the Japanese Tax Authorities
- When and how the economic benefit arose
- Who should be regarded as the grantor of the benefit (the foreign parent company or the Japanese entity)
- Whether the reported content is consistent with the applicable tax treatment
- Whether the reporting is consistent with cross-border tax treatment in the relevant jurisdictions
Our SO Report Service is a specialized service designed to prepare and file this statutory SO Report in a manner that is fully defensible in practice, based on a combined perspective of Japanese taxation, equity compensation structures, and bilateral tax coordination.
Related Content：
Statement of Economic Benefits Provided by a Foreign Parent Company, etc.
This statutory statement is required when a foreign parent company or a related foreign entity provides non-cash economic benefits to directors or employees residing in Japan. In practice, the filing obligation generally falls on the Japanese entity or Japan branch, which is required to submit the statement to the local tax office. Although stock options and RSUs may appear to be granted directly by a foreign corporation, Japanese tax practice often treats them as compensation for services performed in Japan. Accordingly, the purpose of this statement is to disclose the nature and value of such economic benefits to the Japanese tax authorities. This issue becomes particularly sensitive in cases involving stock options of foreign private companies, RSUs issued by U.S. or Chinese listed companies, or situations where the Japanese entity does not bear the related compensation cost. If the necessity or content of the SO Report is misjudged, the consequences may include failures in withholding tax, recharacterization as employment income, or even transfer pricing issues.
Strength of SO Report Practice Grounded in Japanese Tax Law
An SO Report cannot be completed simply by listing plan names and monetary amounts. In Japanese tax practice, the authorities carefully assess whether the exercise gains from stock options or vesting gains from RSUs should be treated as employment income, how Japanese-source and foreign-source income should be allocated in the case of non-permanent residents, the degree of involvement of the foreign parent and the Japanese entity—such as cost bearing and decision-making authority—and which entity bears the withholding tax responsibility. All of these tax positions must be consistent with the information disclosed in the SO Report.
Based on extensive experience in Japanese tax audits and international tax matters, we place particular emphasis on preparing SO Reports that raise no red flags from the tax authorities and can be clearly explained if questioned at a later stage.
Accurate Reporting Based on a Proper Understanding of Equity Compensation
The complexity of SO Reports largely arises from the fact that different equity compensation instruments have fundamentally different tax characteristics. Stock options, RSUs, and dividend equivalents attached to RSUs must each be analyzed separately. For example, stock option exercise gains are generally treated as compensation for services, while RSU vesting gains are also typically taxed as employment income. By contrast, dividend equivalents associated with RSUs are treated as FDAP income (dividend-type income) under U.S. tax law, and when paid through a U.S. brokerage account, the applicable withholding tax rate may depend directly on whether a valid Form W-8BEN has been submitted. If these distinctions are not properly understood, inconsistencies may arise between foreign withholding treatment, the content of the Japanese SO Report, and the individual’s personal tax filings, significantly increasing audit risk.
Our approach is to analyze both the design and the actual operation of the equity compensation plan and to clearly identify the true nature of the economic benefit that should be reflected in the SO Report.
Seamless Cross-Border Support (Japan × U.S., China, and Other Jurisdictions)
An SO Report should never be prepared by looking only at Japan in isolation. In practice, it is closely linked to foreign withholding taxes, tax treaty application, Japanese employment income taxation and foreign tax credits, and global mobility issues such as inbound and outbound assignments or exit taxation. Typical examples include 30% U.S. withholding due to failure to submit Form W-8BEN for RSU dividend equivalents received as a non-U.S. resident, or situations where Chinese withholding tax applies to stock options issued by Chinese listed companies and must later be reconciled through foreign tax credits in Japan. If cross-border processing is mishandled, the SO Report itself can become a source of tax risk.
Through our network of partner firms specializing in M&A and international taxation, we provide integrated, bilateral support, ensuring that Japanese and foreign tax treatments are aligned and that SO Reports are prepared and explained consistently across jurisdictions.
SO Reports Are Not “Formalities” but Tools for Tax Risk Management
An SO Report is not a document that can be forgotten once filed. Rather, it is a critical piece of evidence used to demonstrate to the Japanese tax authorities that equity compensation granted by a foreign parent company has been properly identified, evaluated, and taxed. Only by combining strong expertise in Japanese taxation, a deep understanding of equity compensation structures, and a clear view of cross-border tax coordination can an SO Report become a truly meaningful and defensible filing.
Should you need any assistance from us, please feel free to contact us.